State cannabis and hemp programs set residual solvent limits that directly constrain which chemicals a processor can use. Colorado's Marijuana Enforcement Division, for example, caps Class 2 residual solvents (hexane, acetone) at specific ppm thresholds in finished concentrates. Oregon's OLCC program requires processors to maintain lot-specific COAs for every solvent used in production — a generic spec sheet from the supplier is not sufficient.
For kratom and non-cannabis botanicals, FDA oversight under 21 CFR 111 (current Good Manufacturing Practices for dietary supplements) applies. This means incoming raw material verification, including chemical inputs. Processors must document that each lot of solvent meets their internal specifications before use.
OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) requires current Safety Data Sheets for every chemical on-site. Facilities storing flammable solvents like Acetone ACS Grade and Ethyl Acetate ACS Grade must comply with NFPA 30 (Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code) for storage quantities and ventilation. Consult your regulatory team for current state-specific requirements, as these evolve frequently.