Data Center Glycol Inhibitor Chemistry Guide | OAT vs NOAT vs HOAT
andre taki Updated: โฑ๏ธ 35 min read ๐Ÿ“‹ Step-by-Step Guide ๐Ÿ”ฌ Technical Guide

Data Center Glycol Inhibitor Chemistry Guide | OAT vs NOAT vs HOAT

Summary

Understanding inhibitor chemistry is critical for data center operators. This technical deep-dive explains OAT, NOAT, molybdate-OAT, and HOAT inhibitor technologies, helping you select the right corrosion protection for your cooling system. Learn why organic acid technology outperforms traditional silicate-based inhibitors, how to choose between ethylene glycol and propylene glycol, proper concentration calculations for freeze protection, and testing protocols to prevent multi-million dollar failures. Includes real-world case studies, troubleshooting guides, and recommended formulations by application.

ย 

Complete technical guide to corrosion inhibitor technology in glycol coolants: OAT, NOAT, Molybdate, HOAT chemistry, selection criteria, and monitoring protocols for mission-critical cooling systems

๐Ÿ”ฌ Who This Guide Is For

This is a technical deep-dive written for data center facility managers, mechanical engineers, commissioning agents, and operations personnel who need to understand why inhibitor chemistry mattersโ€”not just what product to buy. If you're responsible for specifying, purchasing, maintaining, or troubleshooting glycol-based cooling systems protecting multi-million-dollar IT infrastructure, this guide will help you make informed decisions about inhibitor selection, testing protocols, and fluid management strategies.

What We Supply (Important Starting Point)

Alliance Chemical supplies pre-inhibited glycol solutionsโ€”complete and ready for service. We do not sell inhibitor packages separately, additive concentrates, or "booster" chemicals. Every glycol formulation we ship already contains a factory-blended corrosion inhibitor package matched to the base glycol type (EG or PG) and intended application.

What this approach means:

  • โœ… Consistent chemistry: Inhibitor type, concentration, and metal compatibility are controlled at the manufacturing level
  • โœ… No field mixing errors: You receive fluid ready to pump into your cooling loopโ€”no dosing, blending, or chemistry calculations required
  • โœ… Traceable quality: Every batch includes a Certificate of Analysis documenting inhibitor levels, pH, and reserve alkalinity
  • โŒ No standalone inhibitors: If your existing system needs inhibitor "top-up," you'll need to drain and refill with fresh inhibited glycol rather than trying to dose additives

๐Ÿ’ก TL;DR for Busy Engineers

  • OAT (Organic Acid Technology) inhibitors are the preferred choice for data center closed loopsโ€”long-life, low conductivity, excellent mixed-metal protection
  • We supply pre-inhibited Ethylene Glycol (EG) and Propylene Glycol (PG) with OAT or molybdate-OAT formulations
  • Available as concentrate (100%) for on-site blending or pre-mixed (30-60%) for convenience
  • Packaging: 1 quart to 275-gallon totes (1-qt ships as Limited Quantityโ€”no hazmat fees)
  • Testing is critical: Monitor pH, reserve alkalinity, and freeze point annually minimumโ€”more frequently in high-heat systems

Ready to order? Jump to Products | Need custom spec? Call (512) 365-6838

Modern data center server room with rows of high-density server racks requiring precision cooling systems and inhibited glycol coolant for thermal management and corrosion protection

Mission-critical data center infrastructure depends on reliable cooling systems protected by properly inhibited glycol formulations

Understanding Inhibitor Chemistry: What Inhibitors Actually Do

The Corrosion Problem in Data Center Cooling Loops

Uninhibited glycol (pure ethylene glycol or propylene glycol without additives) will actively corrode a closed-loop cooling system. Here's why:

Electrochemical galvanic corrosion: Data center cooling systems contain dissimilar metals in electrical contactโ€”carbon steel piping, copper heat exchanger tubes, aluminum CRAH/CRAC coils, brass fittings, and stainless steel components. When these metals are immersed in the same conductive fluid, they form galvanic couples where more anodic metals (steel, aluminum) corrode to protect more noble metals (copper, stainless). This process is accelerated by:

  • Temperature: Corrosion rates roughly double for every 18ยฐF (10ยฐC) increaseโ€”data center chilled water loops operating at 60-80ยฐF still see significant corrosion, while condenser loops at 95-105ยฐF face extreme rates
  • Dissolved oxygen: Even in "closed" loops, makeup water introduces oxygen that accelerates oxidation reactions
  • Flow velocity: High-velocity flow (>4 ft/s) in undersized piping causes erosion-corrosion and removes protective oxide films
  • pH drift: Glycol oxidation produces acidic byproducts (glycolic acid, formic acid, oxalic acid) that drive pH down below 7.0, massively accelerating corrosion

Without inhibitors, typical corrosion rates in uninhibited 40% glycol at 140ยฐF:

Metal Corrosion Rate (mils/year) What This Means
Carbon Steel 15-25 mpy Pipe wall thinning, rust deposits, system fouling
Copper 0.5-2 mpy Heat exchanger tube pitting, reduced efficiency
Aluminum 5-15 mpy CRAC coil perforation, refrigerant leaks
Brass 1-3 mpy Dezincification, fitting failures
Cast Iron 10-20 mpy Pump casing erosion, graphitic corrosion

Note: 1 mil = 0.001 inch. A 15 mpy (mils per year) rate means 0.015" wall loss annuallyโ€”Schedule 40 steel pipe has only ~0.15" wall thickness, so uninhibited glycol could perforate pipe in 10 years.

Industrial chiller unit with copper tube heat exchanger and aluminum cooling fins showing mixed-metal construction requiring molybdate-OAT or azole-enhanced inhibitor protection against galvanic corrosion

Mixed-metal cooling systems require advanced inhibitor packages to prevent galvanic corrosion between dissimilar metals

How Inhibitors Work: The Three-Layer Defense

Effective inhibitor packages use multiple mechanisms to protect metal surfaces:

1. pH Buffering (Alkaline Reserve)

Inhibitor packages include pH buffers (typically alkali metal hydroxides, borates, or phosphates) that maintain pH in the slightly alkaline range (8.0-9.5). This serves two purposes:

  • Passivation: Alkaline pH promotes formation of protective metal oxide films (Feโ‚ƒOโ‚„ on steel, CuO on copper)
  • Neutralization: Buffers neutralize acidic corrosion byproducts (glycolic acid, formic acid) that form as glycol slowly oxidizes over time

Reserve alkalinity is the measure of how much acid the inhibitor can neutralize before pH drops below the protective range. Fresh inhibited glycol has high reserve alkalinity (10-20 mL 0.1N HCl per 10 mL sample); when reserve alkalinity drops to 50% of the original level, the fluid should be replaced or recharged.

2. Anodic Inhibition (Passivating Films)

Certain inhibitor compoundsโ€”particularly organic carboxylates (sebacic acid, 2-ethylhexanoic acid), nitrites, molybdates, and azolesโ€”adsorb onto metal surfaces and form stable, coherent oxide layers that physically separate the metal from the corrosive environment. These films are:

  • Self-healing: If damaged by mechanical abrasion or cavitation, the inhibitor reforms the protective layer
  • Metal-selective: Different inhibitors target different metals (azoles for copper/brass, carboxylates for ferrous metals, molybdates for aluminum)
  • Nanometer-scale thin: Don't interfere with heat transfer but provide robust corrosion protection

3. Cathodic Inhibition (Oxygen Scavenging)

Some inhibitor systems (particularly those with nitrite) include oxygen scavengers that react with dissolved oxygen before it can participate in corrosion reactions. This is especially important in systems with frequent makeup water addition or air ingress through pump seals.

Inhibitor Types: Deep Comparison for Data Center Applications

Not all inhibitor chemistries are created equal for data center cooling applications. Understanding the differences helps you specify the right fluidโ€”and recognize when a vendor is trying to sell you outdated or inappropriate technology.

Complete Inhibitor Technology Comparison

Inhibitor Type Common Additives pH Range Description / Suitability
OAT
(Organic Acid Technology)
2-ethylhexanoic acid, sebacate, benzoate, carboxylates 7.5 โ€“ 9.0 BEST CHOICE Preferred for data center closed loops. Provides long-term protection (5-10 year service life) with very low conductivity (<500 ยตS/cm). Contains NO silicates, phosphates, or nitritesโ€”prevents scale formation, deposit buildup, and electrical conductivity issues. Excellent for aluminum, copper, and mixed-metal systems.
NOAT
(Nitrited Organic Acid Technology)
Carboxylates + nitrite (NaNOโ‚‚ or KNOโ‚‚) 8.0 โ€“ 9.0 ACCEPTABLE Good for mixed-metal industrial systems. Nitrite provides rapid passivation of ferrous metals and acts as oxygen scavenger. Slightly higher conductivity than pure OAT (500-1200 ยตS/cm). Caveat: Nitrite depletes over time and must be monitoredโ€”when nitrite drops below 300 ppm, corrosion protection degrades rapidly. Requires annual testing.
Molybdate-OAT Carboxylates + sodium molybdate (Naโ‚‚MoOโ‚„) 7.5 โ€“ 9.0 EXCELLENT Premium choice for high-value data center loops. Molybdate provides superior corrosion control on aluminum (critical for CRAC coils) and acts as a backup inhibitor if pH drifts. Low conductivity similar to pure OAT. Widely used in mission-critical chilled water systems. Slightly more expensive than standard OAT but offers best-in-class performance.
Phosphate-Free HOAT
(Hybrid OAT)
Carboxylates + small amounts of silicate or borate 8.0 โ€“ 9.5 CONDITIONAL Acceptable IF silicate content is very low (<100 ppm). Traditional HOAT formulations with high silicate (500+ ppm) should be avoided in data centersโ€”silicate causes gel formation, heat exchanger fouling, and pump seal failures. Modern low-silicate HOAT formulations are acceptable but offer no advantage over pure OAT or molybdate-OAT.
Azole-Enhanced OAT Carboxylates + tolyltriazole (TTA) or benzotriazole (BTA) 8.0 โ€“ 9.0 GOOD Common in propylene glycol coolants for electronics cooling and aluminum-heavy systems. Azoles specifically protect copper and brass from dezincification. Excellent choice when copper heat exchangers are present. Low conductivity, long service life. Often specified for precision cooling applications.
Low-pH "Extended Life" PG Systems Proprietary organic blends (varies by manufacturer) 8.0 โ€“ 8.5 MARKETED FOR DATA CENTERS Several manufacturers (Dynalene, Dow Frost EXT, Hercules Cryo-Tek) market low-pH inhibited PG specifically for HVAC and data center chillers. These formulations claim 8-10 year service life and use proprietary organic inhibitor blends. Performance is generally good but requires following manufacturer-specific testing and maintenance protocols. Key point: "Low pH" means 8.0-8.5 (still alkaline)โ€”NOT acidic.
โš ๏ธ Traditional IAT
(Inorganic Additive Technology)
Silicates, phosphates, borates, nitrites, molybdates 8.5 โ€“ 10.5 AVOID Old technology used in automotive cooling (pre-2000s). High silicate content (1000+ ppm) causes gel formation, scale deposits, and heat exchanger fouling in data center systems. High conductivity (1500-3000 ยตS/cm) interferes with water-cooled electronics. Short service life (2-3 years). Phosphates form scale in hard water. Do not use IAT inhibitors in modern data center cooling systems.
Laboratory analysis of glycol coolant testing pH levels, reserve alkalinity, freeze point protection, and inhibitor concentration for data center cooling system quality control and corrosion monitoring

Regular laboratory testing of coolant chemistry ensures optimal inhibitor performance and early detection of corrosion problems

Why OAT and Molybdate-OAT Are Preferred for Data Centers

Data center cooling systems have unique requirements that make organic acid technology (OAT) the clear winner:

1. Low electrical conductivity

Water-cooled server racks, immersion cooling, and direct-to-chip liquid cooling require coolants with minimal electrical conductivity to prevent short circuits and galvanic corrosion in electronics. OAT inhibitors provide excellent corrosion protection while maintaining conductivity below 500 ยตS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter). Traditional IAT inhibitors with silicates and phosphates can exceed 2000 ยตS/cmโ€”unacceptable for electronics cooling applications.

2. No scale or deposit formation

Data center heat exchangersโ€”especially microchannel aluminum coils in CRAC units and brazed plate heat exchangers in free cooling systemsโ€”have extremely tight flow passages (0.5-2mm). Silicate gelation, phosphate scale, and other deposits from traditional inhibitors will foul these passages, reducing capacity and increasing pressure drop. OAT inhibitors contain zero silicates or phosphates, eliminating this failure mode entirely.

3. Extended service life (lower TCO)

Draining, flushing, and refilling a 10,000-gallon data center cooling loop costs $15,000-30,000 in fluid, labor, and downtime. OAT-inhibited glycol delivers 8-10 year service life when properly maintained, versus 2-3 years for traditional IAT formulations. Over a 20-year facility lifecycle, OAT saves 50-60% on fluid changeout costs.

4. Aluminum compatibility

Modern CRAC/CRAH units use aluminum microchannel coils for weight reduction and thermal performance. Molybdate-OAT formulations provide superior aluminum protection compared to standard OATโ€”molybdate forms a stable, protective MoOโ‚ƒ film on aluminum oxide surfaces. For facilities with significant aluminum components, molybdate-OAT is the gold standard.

5. Mixed-metal system stability

Typical data center loops contain carbon steel pipe, copper brazed plate heat exchangers, aluminum coils, brass valves, and stainless steel strainersโ€”five different metals in the same system. OAT carboxylates adsorb onto all of these surfaces, forming protective films that suppress galvanic coupling. The result: all metals corrode at slow, uniform rates without preferential attack on any one material.

Real-World Example: Why Silicates Are a Problem

A hyperscale data center in Virginia commissioned a new 15,000-ton chilled water plant with traditional IAT-inhibited ethylene glycol (30% concentration, 1200 ppm silicate). Within 18 months, operators noticed:

  • Differential pressure across brazed plate heat exchangers increased 40% (from 8 psi to 11.2 psi)
  • Chiller efficiency degraded by 8% (kW/ton increased from 0.52 to 0.56)
  • CRAC unit face velocity dropped 15% due to coil fouling
  • Pump seal failures increasedโ€”silicate gel damaged mechanical seals

Root cause: Silicate in the IAT inhibitor formed gelatinous deposits (silica gel) that accumulated in heat exchangers, coils, and narrow passages. The facility drained the system ($125,000 in lost fluid and labor), chemically cleaned all heat exchangers ($85,000), and refilled with molybdate-OAT inhibited glycol. Problem solvedโ€”system has operated trouble-free for 4 years since the changeout.

Lesson: Silicate-based inhibitors save money upfront but cost far more in maintenance, efficiency losses, and premature failures. Specify OAT or molybdate-OAT from day one.

EG vs. PG: Glycol Base Selection for Data Centers

Both ethylene glycol (EG) and propylene glycol (PG) can be formulated with excellent OAT or molybdate-OAT inhibitors. The choice comes down to thermal performance, toxicity profile, and system requirements:

Ethylene Glycol (EG): Maximum Thermal Efficiency

Choose EG when:

  • Thermal performance is the top priority (lower viscosity = better heat transfer and lower pumping energy)
  • Closed-loop industrial cooling where toxicity is not a concern
  • Large systems (10,000+ gallons) where cost matters (EG is 20-30% less expensive than PG)
  • Free cooling systems operating at low temperatures (-10ยฐF to 40ยฐF) where PG's higher viscosity becomes problematic

Thermal advantages of EG vs. PG at 30% concentration, 68ยฐF:

Property 30% Ethylene Glycol 30% Propylene Glycol Difference
Viscosity 2.5 cP 3.5 cP PG is 40% more viscous
Thermal Conductivity 0.56 W/mยทK 0.52 W/mยทK EG conducts heat 8% better
Specific Heat 3.85 kJ/kgยทK 3.96 kJ/kgยทK PG holds 3% more heat (slight advantage)
Pumping Power (relative) 1.00x 1.25x PG requires 25% more pump energy

What this means in practice: In a 500-ton chilled water system circulating 1200 GPM, switching from 30% EG to 30% PG increases annual pump energy consumption by ~15,000 kWh ($1,500/year at $0.10/kWh). Over 20 years, that's $30,000 in additional electricity costsโ€”more than enough to offset PG's higher fluid cost.

Alliance Chemical EG products:

Propylene Glycol (PG): Low-Toxicity Profile

Choose PG when:

  • Building codes, insurance requirements, or corporate policy mandate low-toxicity coolants
  • System has potential for drinking water cross-contamination (dual-use buildings with potable water and process cooling)
  • Environmental sensitivity (PG is biodegradable and less toxic to aquatic life in case of spills)
  • Food processing facilities or pharmaceutical clean rooms where FDA-compliant coolants are preferred

PG advantages:

  • FDA GRAS status: Propylene glycol is Generally Recognized As Safe for incidental food contactโ€”acceptable in facilities with food/pharma operations
  • Lower acute toxicity: LD50 (rat, oral) is 20,000 mg/kg vs. 4,700 mg/kg for EGโ€”approximately 4x less toxic
  • Biodegradable: PG breaks down naturally in soil and waterโ€”easier environmental remediation if spilled
  • Insurance/regulatory preference: Some jurisdictions or facility insurance policies require low-toxicity coolants in commercial buildings

PG disadvantages:

  • Higher viscosity increases pumping costs 10-25% vs. EG
  • Higher cost per gallon (20-40% premium vs. EG)
  • Slightly reduced heat transfer efficiency

Alliance Chemical PG products:

๐Ÿ’ก EG vs. PG Decision Framework

Use this simple decision tree:

  1. Is low-toxicity required by code, insurance, or corporate policy? โ†’ PG
  2. Is there any potential for drinking water cross-contamination? โ†’ PG
  3. Is system size >10,000 gallons and energy cost >$0.08/kWh? โ†’ EG (ROI favors lower pumping cost)
  4. Operating temperature below 35ยฐF in free cooling mode? โ†’ EG (lower viscosity at cold temps)
  5. All else equal โ†’ EG (better thermal performance, lower cost)

Bottom line: PG is an excellent choice when low toxicity is valued or required. EG is the performance and cost leader when toxicity isn't a constraint. Both work beautifully with modern OAT/molybdate-OAT inhibitors.

Concentration Selection & Freeze Protection

Glycol concentration determines freeze point, burst point, viscosity, and heat transfer efficiency. The "right" concentration balances freeze protection needs against thermal performance and cost.

Typical Data Center Concentration Targets

Application Recommended Glycol % Freeze Point Rationale
Chilled Water (No Freeze Risk) 0% (water only) 32ยฐF (0ยฐC) If loop never sees freezing temps, use plain water + corrosion inhibitor (cheaper, better heat transfer). But: most facilities still use 20-30% glycol for margin.
Standard Chilled Water (Freeze Margin) 20-30% 15ยฐF to -10ยฐF Provides safety margin against coil freeze during shutdown, commissioning, or control failures. Minimal thermal performance penalty.
Free Cooling Systems (Cold Climate) 30-40% -10ยฐF to -30ยฐF Must handle outdoor air temperatures + wind chill. Higher concentration prevents freeze damage to dry coolers and outdoor piping.
Extreme Cold / Arctic Locations 40-50% -30ยฐF to -60ยฐF Alaska, northern Canada, high-altitude sites. Maximum freeze protection with acceptable viscosity.
Immersion Cooling / Direct-to-Chip 10-20% 22ยฐF to 15ยฐF Low concentration for maximum heat transfer, minimal electrical conductivity. Systems typically indoor with no freeze risk.

The Freeze Point Curve: More Isn't Always Better

One of the most common misconceptions is that "more glycol = more protection." This is only true up to about 60% concentration. Beyond that, freeze protection actually decreases because pure glycol has a higher freezing point than properly mixed solutions.

Ethylene Glycol Freeze Point by Concentration:

EG Concentration Freeze Point Burst Point Pumping Power vs. Water
20% 19ยฐF (-7ยฐC) 13ยฐF (-11ยฐC) 1.1x
30% -10ยฐF (-23ยฐC) -18ยฐF (-28ยฐC) 1.25x
40% -30ยฐF (-34ยฐC) -42ยฐF (-41ยฐC) 1.5x
50% -37ยฐF (-38ยฐC) -53ยฐF (-47ยฐC) 2.0x
60% -60ยฐF (-51ยฐC) -75ยฐF (-59ยฐC) 3.5x
70% -64ยฐF (-53ยฐC) -79ยฐF (-62ยฐC) 6.0x
100% (pure) 8ยฐF (-13ยฐC) N/A Do not use

Burst point is the temperature where glycol solution becomes a solid slushy that can rupture pipes. Burst protection extends 10-20ยฐF below freeze point.

โš ๏ธ Common Mistake: Over-Concentration

Engineers sometimes specify 50-60% glycol concentrations "to be safe," especially in free cooling applications. This is usually a mistake. Consider:

  • Diminishing returns: Going from 40% to 50% concentration lowers freeze point only 7ยฐF but increases pumping power by 33%
  • Cost penalty: 50% glycol costs 25% more than 40% glycol for marginal additional protection
  • Heat transfer loss: Higher viscosity reduces heat exchanger effectiveness by 15-20%

Better approach: Select concentration for your actual design outdoor temperature (99.6% ASHRAE cold weather design day) plus 10-15ยฐF safety margin. For most US locations, 30-40% is optimal. Reserve 50%+ for Alaska/Arctic installations.

How to Calculate Required Glycol Concentration

Determine Minimum Operating Temperature

Identify the coldest temperature your system will experience. For free cooling systems, use ASHRAE 99.6% cold weather design dry-bulb temperature for your location (the temperature exceeded 99.6% of the yearโ€”essentially the design minimum). For indoor chilled water systems, consider emergency shutdown scenarios where HVAC fails and building temperature drops to outdoor ambient.

Add Safety Margin

Add 10-15ยฐF safety factor below your minimum operating temperature. This accounts for localized cold spots in the system (outdoor pipe runs exposed to wind), instrument error in temperature sensors, and provides burst protection below the freeze point.

Select Concentration from Chart

Use the freeze point table above to find the minimum glycol concentration that provides freeze protection to your target temperature. Round up to the next standard concentration (20%, 30%, 40%, 50%).

Verify with Refractometer After Mixing

Never trust mixing calculations alone. After blending glycol with water (or when filling with pre-mix), test actual concentration using a refractometer or hydrometer. These $30-100 tools provide instant, accurate concentration readings. Test in at least 3 locations in the system to confirm uniform concentration.

Example calculation:

  • Location: Chicago, IL data center with free cooling
  • ASHRAE 99.6% design dry-bulb: -7ยฐF
  • Safety margin: -7ยฐF - 15ยฐF = -22ยฐF minimum protection required
  • From table: 30% EG provides -10ยฐF freeze pointโ€”not enough
  • Next step: 40% EG provides -30ยฐF freeze pointโ€”adequate
  • Specify 40% ethylene glycol for this application
Precision cooling distribution unit CDU with manifold connections pumping inhibited glycol coolant through data center liquid cooling infrastructure for server rack thermal management

Precision cooling distribution units circulate inhibited glycol through liquid-cooled server infrastructure

Testing & Monitoring: How to Maintain Inhibitor Health

The best inhibitor package in the world won't protect your system if it's depleted, contaminated, or degraded. Regular testing is mandatory for data center cooling systemsโ€”treat coolant monitoring like oil analysis on your emergency generators: it's cheap insurance against expensive failures.

Critical Test Parameters & Frequency

Parameter Test Method Target Range Frequency Action Level
Freeze Point Refractometer or hydrometer Concentration-dependent (see freeze point table) Quarterly If freeze point rises above target +10ยฐF, add glycol or investigate dilution source
pH Calibrated pH meter 7.5 - 9.5 (depends on inhibitor type) Quarterly pH < 7.5 = inhibitor depletion, possible acid contamination. pH > 10.0 = contamination or incorrect fluid
Reserve Alkalinity Acid titration (0.1N HCl) Manufacturer spec (typically 8-20 mL per 10 mL sample for OAT) Annually When reserve alkalinity drops to 50% of original, plan fluid changeout within 1-2 years
Nitrite (if NOAT) Test strips or colorimetric 300-1500 ppm Quarterly (NOAT only) Nitrite < 300 ppm = corrosion protection compromised. Top-up not possibleโ€”requires fluid replacement
Molybdate (if applicable) ICP-OES or colorimetric 25-100 ppm Annually Molybdate depletion rare in closed loops. If < 20 ppm, investigate contamination or incorrect fluid
Chloride Ion chromatography or titration < 25 ppm Annually Chloride > 50 ppm indicates contamination (salt intrusion, makeup water issues). Accelerates stainless steel pitting corrosion
Metals (Fe, Cu, Al) ICP-OES < 20 ppm each Annually Rising metal levels indicate active corrosion. Fe > 50 ppm or Cu > 20 ppm = investigate immediately
Electrical Conductivity Conductivity meter < 500 ยตS/cm (OAT) or < 1200 ยตS/cm (NOAT) Quarterly Rising conductivity indicates contamination or inhibitor depletion
Color / Clarity Visual inspection Clear to slightly yellow, no sediment Quarterly Brown/rusty color = iron corrosion. Green = copper corrosion. Cloudy = biological growth or contamination

How to Collect Representative Coolant Samples

Bad sampling = bad data = bad decisions. Follow these practices for accurate results:

  • Sample from circulating fluid: Never sample from expansion tank, fill port, or dead legs. Sample from a system drain valve or install a sample port on the main circulation loop.
  • Purge first: Flush 3-5x the sample line volume before collecting sample to ensure fresh fluid
  • Use clean containers: Glass or HDPE bottles, rinsed 3x with the fluid being sampled
  • Fill completely: Fill sample container to the top, minimizing airspace to prevent oxidation
  • Label clearly: Include system name, sample location, date, and sampler initials
  • Store properly: If not testing immediately, store samples at room temperature in dark location (UV degrades glycol)
  • Test promptly: Analyze within 2 weeks of collection for best accuracy

In-House vs. Lab Testing

In-house testing (recommended minimum):

  • Freeze point (refractometer): $50-150 tool, instant results, quarterly testing
  • pH (digital meter): $100-300 tool, requires calibration, quarterly testing
  • Nitrite (if NOAT): $25 test strips, quarterly
  • Visual inspection: Free, quarterly

Laboratory testing (recommended annually):

  • Complete coolant analysis package: $150-300 per sample
  • Includes: pH, reserve alkalinity, freeze point, metals analysis (ICP-OES), chloride, conductivity, inhibitor levels
  • Many coolant suppliers (including Alliance Chemical) can recommend partner labs or provide interpretation support
  • Worth the cost for mission-critical systemsโ€”early detection of problems saves millions in avoided failures

Case Study: How Testing Prevented a $2M Failure

A co-location data center in Dallas operated 5 years on 30% inhibited ethylene glycol (molybdate-OAT formulation) without testing. During a routine annual shutdown for maintenance, the facility manager decided to test coolant as a "belt and suspenders" check before resuming operations.

Lab results:

  • pH: 6.8 (target: 8.0-9.0)
  • Reserve alkalinity: 2.1 mL (original: 15 mL)โ€”86% depleted
  • Iron: 127 ppm (target: <20 ppm)
  • Freeze point: 14ยฐF (target: -10ยฐF)โ€”significant dilution

Investigation revealed:

  • Makeup water was being added automatically via float valve without glycol dosing (system treated like automotive cooling with pure water makeup)
  • Over 5 years, gradual dilution from ~30% to ~18% glycol concentration
  • Low glycol + depleted inhibitors = active corrosion in carbon steel piping (127 ppm iron confirms)
  • pH drop to 6.8 indicates acid byproduct accumulation from glycol oxidation

Actions taken:

  • Immediate system drain and flush ($18,000 in labor + downtime)
  • Chemical cleaning of heat exchangers to remove iron oxide deposits ($12,000)
  • Refill with fresh 30% inhibited glycol ($25,000 for 8,000 gallons)
  • Install auto-fill lockout requiring manual override (prevents future dilution)
  • Implement quarterly testing protocol

Cost of response: $55,000

Cost if not caught: Estimated 3-5 more years of operation would have caused pipe perforation, chiller tube leaks, and CRAC coil failures. Estimated repair cost: $2-3 million + months of partial downtime.

Lesson: A $200 annual lab test literally saved this facility millions. Do not skip coolant testing.

Inhibitor Selection Guide: Choosing the Right Formulation

With a solid understanding of inhibitor chemistry, here's a practical decision framework for specifying coolant for new construction or replacing fluid in existing systems:

Step 1: Identify System Metallurgy

Document all metals present in your cooling loop. Common configurations:

  • Steel-dominant: Carbon steel pipe, steel chillers, minimal copper (common in older industrial systems)
  • Copper-dominant: Copper tube heat exchangers, brass fittings, some steel piping (common in commercial HVAC)
  • Aluminum-dominant: Microchannel aluminum coils, aluminum dry coolers (modern high-efficiency systems)
  • Mixed: Steel pipe + copper heat exchangers + aluminum coils + stainless strainers (most data centers)

Recommendation: For mixed-metal systems (most data centers), choose molybdate-OAT or azole-enhanced OAT for universal protection.

Step 2: Check Application-Specific Requirements

Certain applications have special needs:

  • Immersion cooling / direct-to-chip: Ultra-low conductivity (<200 ยตS/cm) mandatory โ†’ pure OAT or low-pH PG formulations
  • Free cooling systems: Wide operating temperature range (-10ยฐF to 95ยฐF) โ†’ molybdate-OAT for aluminum dry cooler protection
  • Food/pharma facilities: Low-toxicity requirement โ†’ propylene glycol with azole-enhanced OAT
  • Legacy systems (pre-2000): May have old IAT fluidโ€”requires complete flush before converting to OAT

Step 3: Choose Glycol Base (EG vs. PG)

Use the decision framework from the EG vs. PG section:

  • Low-toxicity required or preferred: โ†’ Propylene Glycol
  • Maximum thermal performance, large system, low operating temps: โ†’ Ethylene Glycol
  • No strong preference: โ†’ Ethylene Glycol (lower cost, better performance)

Step 4: Select Concentration

Calculate required freeze protection per the concentration selection section. Order either:

  • Pre-mix: Ready-to-use at specified concentration (30%, 40%, 50%)โ€”convenient for smaller systems or when blending equipment isn't available
  • Concentrate (100%): Blend on-site with deionized or distilled waterโ€”economical for large systems, allows precise concentration tuning

Step 5: Specify Inhibitor Technology

Based on your system analysis:

  • Mixed-metal, high-value system: โ†’ Molybdate-OAT (best protection, lowest risk)
  • Copper-heavy system: โ†’ Azole-enhanced OAT (excellent copper/brass protection)
  • Standard closed loop, cost-sensitive: โ†’ Standard OAT (great performance, lower cost)
  • Ferrous-heavy industrial: โ†’ NOAT acceptable (nitrite protects steel well, requires more testing)
  • Never specify: Traditional IAT with silicates for data center applications

Step 6: Confirm with Supplier

Provide your system details to Alliance Chemical (or your preferred supplier):

  • System volume (gallons)
  • Metallurgy (steel/copper/aluminum/mixed)
  • Operating temperature range
  • Freeze protection requirement
  • Any special requirements (low conductivity, low toxicity, etc.)

We'll recommend the optimal formulation and provide a quote. Call (512) 365-6838 or email sales@alliancechemical.com.

Quick Reference: Recommended Formulations by Application

Data Center Application Recommended Glycol Base Recommended Inhibitor Typical Concentration
Air-cooled chiller loop (indoor) Ethylene Glycol Molybdate-OAT 30% (freeze margin)
Water-cooled chiller loop (indoor) EG or PG (either works) OAT or Molybdate-OAT 20-30% (freeze margin)
Free cooling system (dry cooler) Ethylene Glycol Molybdate-OAT 30-40% (outdoor exposure)
CRAC/CRAH glycol coils Ethylene Glycol Molybdate-OAT 30-40% (aluminum coils)
Immersion cooling loop Propylene Glycol Low-pH PG or pure OAT 10-20% (low conductivity)
Direct-to-chip cold plates Propylene Glycol Low-pH PG or pure OAT 10-30% (varies by design)
Commercial building (shared with HVAC) Propylene Glycol Azole-enhanced OAT 20-30% (low-toxicity preference)
Retrofit / legacy system cleanup Match original or EG Molybdate-OAT Match original concentration

Maintenance Best Practices: Keeping Your System Healthy

Initial Fill & Commissioning

When filling a new or drained system with inhibited glycol:

  1. Pre-fill system cleaning: Flush new systems with water to remove cutting oils, welding slag, flux residue, and construction debris. Existing systems being refilled should be chemically cleaned if showing signs of corrosion, scale, or biological growth. Use manufacturer-approved cleaning chemicals, then flush thoroughly with clean water.
  2. Verify system integrity: Pressure-test system to 1.5x operating pressure before filling with glycol (no sense filling with expensive coolant only to find leaks).
  3. Fill with deaerated fluid: If possible, deaerate glycol before filling (especially important for high-temperature systems). Dissolved oxygen accelerates corrosion. Simple method: heat glycol to 180ยฐF in vented drum, allow to coolโ€”drives off most dissolved Oโ‚‚.
  4. Fill slowly, vent continuously: Fill at <10 GPM while venting all high points, air separators, and manual vents. Air pockets cause cavitation, noise, and flow problems.
  5. Circulate before startup: Run pumps for 2-4 hours before bringing system online. This ensures complete air removal and uniform concentration.
  6. Test, document, baseline: After circulation but before full-load operation, collect samples and test pH, freeze point, conductivity, and reserve alkalinity. Document these "time-zero" baseline values for future comparison.

Ongoing Maintenance

Quarterly checks (in-house testing):

  • Visual inspection: Look for leaks, weeping fittings, corrosion stains on piping
  • Test freeze point with refractometer at 3 locations in system (supply, return, expansion tank)
  • Test pH with calibrated meter
  • Test nitrite (if NOAT system) with test strips
  • Check expansion tank levelโ€”frequent makeup indicates leaks
  • Document findings in maintenance log

Annual comprehensive testing (lab analysis):

  • Collect samples per proper procedure
  • Send to coolant testing laboratory for complete analysis: pH, reserve alkalinity, freeze point, metals (Fe, Cu, Al, Pb), chloride, conductivity, inhibitor levels (nitrite, molybdate if applicable)
  • Review results against baseline and manufacturer specifications
  • Trend metal concentrations year-over-year (rising metals = active corrosion)
  • Plan fluid changeout when reserve alkalinity drops to 50% or metals exceed action levels

When to Change Glycol (Replacement Triggers)

Don't wait for fluid to turn brown and pumps to fail. Plan fluid replacement based on objective test data:

Replace fluid when:

  • Reserve alkalinity < 50% of original: Inhibitor protection is depleted
  • pH < 7.5 or > 10.0: Outside protective range, indicates contamination or degradation
  • Metal levels exceed limits: Fe > 50 ppm, Cu > 20 ppm, or Al > 20 ppm indicates active corrosion
  • Freeze point rises > 15ยฐF above target: Significant dilution from makeup waterโ€”indicates loss of freeze protection
  • Nitrite (NOAT) < 300 ppm: Critical inhibitor depleted, protection compromised
  • Molybdate < 20 ppm: Rare but indicates contamination or wrong fluid
  • Service life reached: Even if tests look good, OAT-inhibited glycol has a 8-10 year maximum service life. Chemical breakdown products accumulate over time and some inhibitor components slowly deplete even in well-maintained systems.

Planned replacement schedule (ideal):

  • Year 0: Fill new system, baseline testing
  • Years 1-7: Quarterly pH/freeze point checks, annual lab analysis
  • Year 8: Schedule fluid changeout during planned maintenance window
  • Repeat cycle

Makeup & Top-Off Procedures

Critical rule: Always maintain concentration. When adding fluid to compensate for leaks or evaporation, you must add the same glycol/water ratio that's already in the system. Common mistakes:

  • โŒ Wrong: Topping off 30% glycol system with pure water (dilutes concentration, reduces freeze protection)
  • โŒ Wrong: Topping off with 100% concentrate (increases concentration, raises viscosity, wastes money)
  • โœ… Correct: Top off 30% system with 30% pre-mix (maintains concentration)
  • โœ… Correct: Calculate ratio and mix concentrate with water to match system concentration, then add

Better approach: Minimize makeup. Makeup water introduces dissolved oxygen, chlorides, and other contaminants. Every time you add makeup, you're adding corrosion risk. Instead:

  • Fix leaks immediately: Don't band-aid problems with makeupโ€”repair leaking fittings, weeping seals, and corroded components
  • Monitor makeup rate: If you're adding > 2% system volume per year, you have a leak that needs finding
  • Use deionized water for makeup: Never use tap waterโ€”minerals accelerate corrosion and deplete inhibitors. If you must add makeup, use only deionized or distilled water blended with concentrate to match system concentration.

Alliance Chemical Inhibited Glycol Products

Alliance Chemical supplies pre-inhibited heat-transfer fluids purpose-built for data center cooling systems. Every formulation includes factory-blended corrosion inhibitors matched to the base glycol and application.

Ethylene Glycol (EG) โ€“ Maximum Thermal Performance

  • 100% Ethylene Glycol Inhibited โ€“ OAT-inhibited concentrate for on-site blending. Provides maximum freeze protection when mixed at 50-60% concentration. Ideal for large systems where bulk concentrate is economical. Available in 1-quart to 275-gallon totes.
  • Ethylene Glycol Inhibited ACS Grade โ€“ High-purity, analytical-grade formulation for critical applications requiring ultra-clean coolant. Low metals, low chloride, tested to ACS specifications. Recommended for immersion cooling and direct-to-chip systems.
  • Ethylene Glycol 60/40 โ€“ Pre-mixed to 60% glycol / 40% water for maximum freeze protection (-60ยฐF). Ready-to-use for extreme cold climate free cooling systems or Arctic data center locations. No blending required.
  • Ethylene Glycol 50/50 โ€“ Standard 50/50 pre-mix providing -37ยฐF freeze protection. Balanced formula for general data center cooling applications. Most common concentration for chilled water loops with freeze margin.

Propylene Glycol (PG) โ€“ Low-Toxicity Profile

  • 100% Propylene Glycol Inhibited โ€“ OAT-inhibited concentrate with low-toxicity FDA GRAS-rated base glycol. Blend to desired concentration on-site. Preferred for commercial buildings, food/pharma facilities, and applications where low-toxicity is mandated or preferred.
  • Propylene Glycol Inhibited ACS Grade โ€“ High-purity, pharmaceutical-grade formulation meeting ACS specifications. Ultra-low metals and chloride for electronics cooling and immersion applications requiring minimal electrical conductivity.
  • Propylene Glycol 50% USP Grade โ€“ Pre-mixed 50/50 formulation meeting USP (United States Pharmacopeia) standards. Suitable for applications requiring pharmaceutical-grade quality. Provides -26ยฐF freeze protection.
  • Arctic Assist โ€“ Propylene glycol-based antifreeze formulated specifically for extreme cold applications. Enhanced low-temperature flow properties. Ideal for outdoor equipment, emergency backup cooling systems, and portable cooling units in arctic environments.

Packaging & Ordering

Available sizes:

  • 1 Quart: Perfect for testing, small top-offs, or spare inventory. Ships as DOT Limited Quantity (no hazmat feesโ€”saves $30-50 per shipment).
  • 1 Gallon: Standard size for maintenance inventory and small systems
  • 5 Gallon Pail: Convenient for moderate makeup or small system fills
  • 55 Gallon Drum: Most economical for large systems or annual maintenance inventory
  • 275 Gallon Tote: Bulk pricing for hyperscale data centers and large system fills

Custom concentrations: Need a specific mix ratio not listed (e.g., 35% for your exact freeze point target)? We can blend to spec in drum or tote quantities. Minimum order applies for custom concentrations. Call (512) 365-6838 to discuss.

Documentation provided:

  • Certificate of Analysis (COA) with every shipmentโ€”documents pH, reserve alkalinity, concentration, and lot number
  • Safety Data Sheet (SDS) available for download on product pages
  • Technical Data Sheet (TDS) with freeze point curves, physical properties, and dilution tables

How to Order

  1. Browse products: Visit our Coolants & Antifreeze Collection to see all available formulations
  2. Select specification: Choose glycol base (EG or PG), concentration (concentrate or pre-mix), and package size
  3. Add to cart and checkout: Standard e-commerce checkout for stocked sizes
  4. Need a custom spec? Call (512) 365-6838 or email sales@alliancechemical.com with:
    • System volume (gallons)
    • Target concentration (%)
    • Glycol type preference (EG or PG)
    • Inhibitor requirements (OAT, molybdate-OAT, etc.)
    • Delivery location
    We'll quote custom blends, bulk pricing, and provide technical recommendations.

Technical Support

Alliance Chemical provides complimentary technical support for coolant selection, system sizing, testing interpretation, and troubleshooting:

  • Pre-purchase consultation: Help selecting the right inhibitor type, concentration, and package size
  • Dilution calculations: Assistance calculating concentrate/water ratios for on-site blending
  • Test result interpretation: Review your lab analysis and recommend actions
  • Troubleshooting: Diagnose coolant-related problems (corrosion, fouling, freezing)
  • Custom formulation: Work with our chemists to develop specialized formulations for unique requirements

Contact technical support: (512) 365-6838 | sales@alliancechemical.com

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Do you sell inhibitor packages separately that I can add to plain glycol?

A: No. Alliance Chemical supplies only pre-inhibited glycol formulations with inhibitors already blended at the factory. We do not sell standalone inhibitor concentrates, additive packs, or "booster" chemicals. This ensures consistent chemistry, eliminates field mixing errors, and guarantees proper inhibitor concentration. If your system needs inhibitor replenishment, the correct approach is to drain and refill with fresh inhibited glycolโ€”not to try dosing additives into degraded fluid.

Q: Which is better for data centersโ€”OAT or NOAT inhibitors?

A: OAT (Organic Acid Technology) or molybdate-OAT are preferred for most data center applications. OAT provides:

  • Longer service life (8-10 years vs. 5-7 for NOAT)
  • Lower electrical conductivity (critical for immersion/direct-to-chip cooling)
  • No nitrite depletion concerns (NOAT requires frequent nitrite testing and fails rapidly when nitrite drops below 300 ppm)
  • Excellent protection for aluminum (common in modern CRAC coils and dry coolers)

NOAT is acceptable for industrial data centers with steel-dominant systems where higher conductivity isn't a concernโ€”but OAT/molybdate-OAT offer better overall performance with less monitoring burden.

Q: Can I mix different inhibitor types (e.g., top off an OAT system with NOAT fluid)?

A: Absolutely not. Mixing inhibitor chemistries can cause inhibitor precipitation, pH instability, and loss of corrosion protection. If you inherit a system with unknown coolant or need to change inhibitor type:

  1. Drain system completely
  2. Flush thoroughly with water (2-3 system volumes minimum)
  3. Refill with fresh inhibited glycol of the new type

Never attempt to "top off" one inhibitor type with another. If you're unsure what's currently in your system, send a sample to a lab for analysis before adding makeup.

Q: My system has been running on plain waterโ€”can I just add glycol concentrate?

A: Technically yes, but with caution. If adding glycol concentrate to a water-only system:

  • Calculate required glycol volume to reach target concentration (use our dilution calculator or formula: glycol volume = system volume ร— target %)
  • Drain that volume of water from system first
  • Add glycol concentrate slowly while circulating to ensure mixing
  • Test concentration with refractometer at multiple points to confirm uniform distribution
  • Allow 24-48 hours circulation before critical loads

Better approach for large systems: Drain completely, then fill with pre-mixed glycol at the target concentration. Ensures uniform concentration and eliminates air entrainment from fluid mixing.

Q: How often should I test my data center coolant?

A: Minimum testing frequency:

  • Quarterly: pH, freeze point (refractometer), visual inspection. Takes 15 minutes with basic tools ($200 investment).
  • Annually: Full lab analysis including reserve alkalinity, metals (Fe, Cu, Al), chloride, conductivity, inhibitor levels. Cost: $150-300 per sample.
  • NOAT systems: Test nitrite quarterly (criticalโ€”nitrite depletion causes rapid corrosion).

High-value systems: For mission-critical data centers protecting $10M+ in IT equipment, consider semi-annual lab analysis ($300/year for two tests). Early detection of problems is cheap insurance compared to system failures.

Q: Our lab results show pH = 7.2 (target: 8.0-9.0). What should we do?

A: pH below 7.5 indicates inhibitor depletion and/or acid contamination. Low pH accelerates corrosionโ€”this needs immediate attention:

  1. Check reserve alkalinity: If reserve alkalinity is also low (< 50% of original), inhibitors are depletedโ€”plan system drain and refill within 30-90 days
  2. Check for contamination: Test for chloride (should be < 25 ppm). High chloride indicates salt intrusion or contaminated makeup water
  3. Inspect for corrosion: Test metals in fluid (Fe, Cu, Al). Rising metals confirm active corrosion.
  4. Do NOT try to "fix" pH: Do not add caustic or other chemicals to raise pH. This treats the symptom, not the cause. The correct fix is fluid replacement.

Emergency response: If equipment is critical and you cannot immediately drain/refill, you can operate for a short time (weeks to months) with low pHโ€”but plan the fluid changeout urgently and monitor metal levels monthly to track corrosion rates.

Q: What's the difference between "freeze point" and "burst point"?

A:

  • Freeze point: Temperature where glycol solution first starts to form ice crystals (begins to solidify). At this temperature, fluid becomes slushy but can still circulate (barely).
  • Burst point: Temperature where glycol solution becomes a solid mass that can rupture pipes and crack components. Typically 10-20ยฐF below freeze point.

Which to specify? Always design for freeze point (not burst point). While burst point is where physical damage occurs, operating at freeze point causes ice formation that plugs heat exchangers, stalls pumps, and damages seals. Your design minimum temperature should be comfortably above the freeze pointโ€”ideally 10-15ยฐF above.

Q: Can I use automotive antifreeze (Prestone, Zerex, etc.) in my data center cooling system?

A: Strongly not recommended. While automotive antifreeze contains glycol and inhibitors, it's formulated for different operating conditions:

  • Automotive: High-temperature (200-220ยฐF), aluminum-dominant, frequent thermal cycling, 5-7 year design life, contains dyes/colorants
  • Data center: Moderate temperature (50-80ยฐF typical), mixed metals, steady-state operation, 8-10+ year design life, low conductivity critical

Automotive formulations often contain silicates (for aluminum engine protection) that cause fouling in data center heat exchangers. They also may not meet low-conductivity requirements for electronics cooling. Specify industrial heat-transfer fluids formulated for HVAC/hydronic/process coolingโ€”not automotive coolants.

Q: How do I calculate how much glycol concentrate to order for my system?

A: Use this formula:

Glycol Volume (gallons) = System Volume (gallons) ร— Target Concentration (%)

Example:

  • System volume: 5,000 gallons
  • Target concentration: 30% (0.30)
  • Glycol needed: 5,000 ร— 0.30 = 1,500 gallons concentrate
  • Water needed: 5,000 - 1,500 = 3,500 gallons deionized water

Ordering tip: Add 5-10% extra for piping volume, expansion tank, and initial makeupโ€”better to have spare concentrate than run short during commissioning. Sealed concentrate has indefinite shelf life.

About Alliance Chemical

Alliance Chemical Technical Team

Heat Transfer Fluid & Corrosion Inhibitor Specialists

Alliance Chemical has supplied industrial chemicals, heat-transfer fluids, and specialty coolant formulations to data centers, industrial facilities, and HVAC systems across North America for over 20 years. Our technical team includes chemical engineers and thermal systems specialists who understand the critical importance of proper inhibitor selection for protecting mission-critical cooling infrastructure.

This guide represents practical knowledge gained from supporting hundreds of data center cooling system installations, fluid changeouts, and corrosion troubleshooting projects. We combine inhibitor chemistry expertise with real-world operational experience to provide guidance that works in actual facilitiesโ€”not just laboratory theory.

Technical Support: (512) 365-6838 | Email: sales@alliancechemical.com

Inhibitor chemistry questions answered within one business day. We provide formulation recommendations, testing interpretation, system diagnostics, and custom blending services at no charge to customers and prospects.

Written by Alliance Chemical Applications Team
Lead Technical Author: Andre Taki, Lead Product Specialist | Email: andre@alliancechemical.com

Technical Review & Validation: Content developed by Alliance Chemical's applications team with input from data center mechanical engineers, HVAC system designers, corrosion specialists, and coolant chemistry experts. Information verified against ASTM standards for heat-transfer fluids (ASTM D1384, D3306, D7714), ASHRAE cooling system design guidelines, manufacturer technical specifications for OAT/NOAT/molybdate inhibitor systems, and data center industry best practices. Inhibitor chemistry information sourced from coolant manufacturers' technical documentation, corrosion engineering references, and Alliance Chemical's field experience supporting data center cooling systems.

๐Ÿ“ž Data Center Cooling System Consultation

Specifying a new data center cooling system? Troubleshooting corrosion or efficiency problems? Planning a fluid changeout? Our technical team provides complimentary consultation services including:

  • Inhibitor chemistry selection (OAT, NOAT, molybdate-OAT) based on your metallurgy and operating conditions
  • Glycol type recommendation (EG vs. PG) balancing thermal performance, toxicity, and cost
  • Concentration calculations for your freeze protection requirement
  • System volume calculations and glycol quantity estimates
  • Testing protocol development (which parameters to test, how often, action levels)
  • Lab result interpretation and troubleshooting recommendations
  • Fluid changeout procedures and chemical cleaning specifications
  • Custom formulation for specialized requirements (ultra-low conductivity, extreme temperatures)
  • Bulk pricing and delivery coordination for large system fills

Direct Technical Line: (512) 365-6838
Monday-Friday, 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM CT. Email your system details (volume, metallurgy, operating temps, freeze protection target) to sales@alliancechemical.com for detailed recommendations and pricing. We respond to all technical inquiries within one business day.

Ready to Get Started?

Explore our selection of Azole Inhibitors products.

Shop Now

Share This Article

About the Author

andre taki

Our team of chemical industry experts brings decades of experience in industrial chemicals, safety protocols, and technical applications.

Stay Updated

Get the latest chemical industry insights delivered to your inbox.